- Where farm decision-makers start their day

« Back to main

Thursday, April 04, 2013

Will You Be in a Cost-Price Squeeze in 2013?

Audio Download



Corn farmers will soon be planting the most expensive crop ever put in the ground, while they are watching the price of corn to see if it will recover from the $1.10 drop in the past week. After all, such a drop in price could push it below the cost of production for many farmers.  With higher input costs and lower commodity prices, many farmers will find themselves in a cost-price squeeze for the 2013 crop.


The cost-price squeeze is laid out in basic numbers by Iowa State University economist Don Hofstrand.  While Hofstrand says his data is effective for farmers in the State of Iowa, it is also effective for many farmers around the Cornbelt.  About the only variable is land cost in the form of cash rent, and Hofstrand’s example uses lower cash rent than many farmers have agreed to pay to land owners.



Higher Production Costs

  1. Production inputs include seed, fertilizers, herbicides diesel fuel, and others.  For 2013 per acre costs he is using $109 for seed corn, $145 for fertilizer and lime, $25 for herbicide, $25 for crop insurance, $55 for fuel and repairs, $34 for grain drying, $32 for labor, $29 for interest and other costs.
  2. The second is the cost of machinery ownership.  These costs are depreciation (an estimate of actual deprecation, not tax depreciation) and interest payments on machinery debt.  Hofstrand uses $54 per acre for machinery costs.
  3. The third is the cost of cropland.  The annual cost of cropland is estimated using the cash rental rate.  By charging a land cost equal to the cash rental rate, the return for producing corn is the return to the farm operator (does not includes the landlord’s return).  Hofstrand uses a figure of $270 per acre for cash rent.


These costs were fairly static until 2004 until a major expansion of the ethanol industry.  Hofstrand says in 2009, production costs spiked over $700 per acre and are expected to reach a $777 per acre average this year.  He says cost per acre will vary per yield and yield will vary greatly depending on the year. In 2012 he says the drought pushed the cost per bushel to $5.38 per bushel, based on a 137 bushel average corn yield in his state of Iowa.  Hofstrand says that number should fall to $4.52 per bushel in 2013, based on a normal yield of 172 bushels per acre.  The $4.52 is calculated from $2.64 in total crop inputs, 31 cents for machinery ownership, and $1.57 per bushel for cash rent.


Higher Cost Per Acre

In addition to the cost per bushel calculation, Hofstrand also looks at the total cost of crop inputs, machinery ownership, and cash rent for planting and harvesting 500 acres of corn. That has risen from $175,000 in 2000 to $388,684 in 2013. The Iowa State economist says, “Although corn production costs have risen substantially in recent years, the cost per bushel has not exceeded selling price.  If corn prices are above cost per bushel in coming years, production costs will continue to rise to fill the gap between cost and price.  If production input costs don’t rise sufficiently to fill this gap, cash rental rates will fill it due to competition among farmers for farmland."


Hofstrand also addresses the cash rent level, which he says will go higher, helped by the crop insurance revenue payment levels, “The current generous revenue insurance program reduces the need for a risk premium in the profit structure of corn production, allowing corn farmers to bid cropland rents even higher. So, the higher corn prices generated by the corn ethanol industry are, or will soon be, fully capitalized into the corn farmer’s cost structure.”


Impact of Ethanol

Due to the reliance of the corn price—and farm income—on the ethanol industry, Hofstrand says any decline in that industry would be felt beyond the profitability of corn growers.  He says the expansion of corn acreage is attributable to the ethanol industry, and such expansion has caused prices of other commodities, such as soybeans and wheat, to rise to maintain their acreage base. And he adds, “To maintain their acreage, the selling prices of other crops have also risen to be competitive with corn.  Higher prices for these other crops means improved profits for a large number of non-corn farmers.  If the demand for corn ethanol drops, the demand for corn will also drop, reducing the competition for acres and causing a price drop for other crops.  This will result in a cost-price squeeze for growers of corn and other crops.”



Corn production costs are rising, and while it will be less than 2012 on a per bushel basis, current costs and commodity prices will put many producers in a cost-price squeeze.  Higher input costs, including machinery expenses and cash rents, will push the cost per bushel into the mid-$4 range for 2013.  Higher prices for corn, resulting from ethanol demand, have caused other commodity prices to rise as well, and any decline in the ethanol industry will negatively impact the profitability of soybeans and wheat, as well as corn.


Posted by Stu Ellis on 04/04 at 11:31 PM | Permalink


Like all years we will roll the dice and wish for the best in yield and price. Demand for corn will not decrease in the next few years so farmers are going to do what ever they can to earn a better living

Posted by: Richard Teegen at April 22, 2013 11:11AM

Post a comment





SPAM? Leave this blank unless you are a spam-bot.


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?